By EdCaptain editorial desk · Published
Two children auditioned. Two children waited. Now the message has arrived: one has a place and the other does not. Before deciding how to tell them, check what the message actually says. A callback, waiting list, provisional place and final offer are different things.
This guide is for families with children aged 6–12 facing different results from a team trial, school production or other selection process. The aim is to give both children an honest response and a workable family plan. Neither child should have to hide their feelings to make the other child comfortable.
Make room for two conversations
If possible, share each result privately before making a family announcement. That gives the selected child space to enjoy the news and the disappointed child space to react without an audience. With one adult available, keep the first conversation brief and tell the other child you will speak with them next. Do not leave them guessing for hours.
Use the facts: “You have been offered a place,” or “You haven’t been offered a place in this production.” Avoid turning the result into a label such as “You’re the talented one” or “Your sister is better at this.”
Boys Town’s guidance specifically addresses siblings receiving different team or club results and recommends listening to their separate experiences. You do not need to predict who will feel what. A selected child might be delighted, awkward or unsure; the child without a place may want company, quiet or practical answers.
Answer disappointment without rewriting the result
Try, “You really wanted this. Would you like me to sit with you, or give you some space?” Let the child decide whether to talk now. Do not immediately offer a lesson about perseverance or list famous people who were rejected.
If they ask why, separate what you know from what you are guessing. “The email doesn’t explain the decision. I can check whether feedback is available.” Do not claim that the selectors were jealous, mistaken or unfair without evidence. Equally, do not invent a reassuring explanation that the child was simply too good for the part.
Selection rules vary. For example, National Youth Theater Racine’s auditions FAQ explicitly warns that one sibling may be cast while another is not, and describes several casting considerations. That is one provider’s policy, not a rule for every show or team. Read the actual criteria and any feedback or appeal procedure for your child’s programme.
If you have a concrete concern about access, discrimination or a process error, raise it through the relevant channel. The child does not need to argue the case against their sibling.
Allow celebration without turning it into comparison
The selected child can be proud. Say, “You’re excited about the opportunity. Tell me what you’re looking forward to.” Do not make them apologise for receiving a place or promise to secure one for their sibling.
Choose a celebration that fits the moment: a private call to a trusted relative, choosing the music on a walk or a later family acknowledgment. Explain the timing honestly: “We can celebrate your news. First I’m going to finish talking with your brother.” A short delay is different from a permanent instruction to keep success secret.
Set a clear boundary on taunting: “You may enjoy your place. You may not use the result to put someone else down.” For everyday language that avoids ranking children, see our guide to stopping sibling comparisons.
Agree what relatives and friends will hear
Ask each child before sharing their result beyond people who need to know. One may welcome congratulations; the other may not want a family group chat discussing what went wrong. Adults can say, “Please congratulate Asha directly, and let Dev bring up his own news if he wants to.”
If someone asks whether both got in, answer briefly without a performance review: “They received different results. We’re leaving the details with them.” Do not ask the selected child to manage relatives’ questions or defend their sibling.
There is no need to require an immediate hug or a cheerful joint photograph. Courtesy can be simple: giving each other space and avoiding insults. A congratulations or acknowledgment of disappointment may come later, when the child is ready to mean it.
Plan the weeks after the announcement
The first evening passes; rehearsals or practices may shape the family calendar for months. Before accepting an offer, check attendance requirements, costs, transport and what the other child will be doing during those hours.
- Map the actual commitment. Include waiting time and performance days, not just the session itself.
- Ask about the sibling’s experience. “Would waiting here be manageable, or should we look for another arrangement?” Adults decide what is feasible.
- Protect some ordinary individual time. A conversation during an errand can matter even when paid activities are not affordable.
- Review after the first sessions. Check whether one child is repeatedly losing their own plans to the other’s timetable.
Do not automatically make the child without a place a helper, audience member or practice partner. They may choose to attend a performance or explore a suitable backstage opportunity, but that should not be the price of belonging to the family. Explain practical differences using the ideas in fairness without identical treatment.
Offer a next step without assigning a comeback
Once the child wants to discuss options, offer a small menu: continue a class they enjoy, try a less selective programme, request useful feedback if offered, or take a break. Check age requirements, accessibility and costs before promising anything.
The American Academy of Pediatrics’ advice on parenting an athlete emphasises unconditional support, realistic child-owned goals and an identity beyond achievement. Applied here, another attempt can be an option rather than a family mission to prove the selectors wrong. Do not promise that more practice guarantees selection next time.
Ages 6–9: Use short explanations and concrete choices: “Not this team this time. Would you like to talk now or after our walk?” Keep checking that the child understands the result is about this place, not their worth.
Ages 10–12: Invite the child to decide whether they want feedback and help draft a respectful question. Agree what information remains private. Children using signing, pictures or another communication system should have the same opportunity to express preferences.
If distress persists, affects everyday life or the siblings begin repeatedly humiliating or frightening each other, seek qualified support. For ordinary disappointment, keep offering attention without repeatedly reopening the result. Both children still need family life that is larger than the selection list.
Sources and further reading
- Boys Town: supporting siblings with different selection results.
- National Youth Theater Racine: an example of a provider’s casting policy.
- American Academy of Pediatrics: supporting the child beyond sports achievement.
Report an error or suggest an improvement
Was this useful?
